AdWords Sitelink Extensions – Why They Work

Sitelink extensions, which are the ability to display up to 4 additional headlines and links within high quality/positioned AdWords ads (example below), were released by Google in November 2009 and since then have become extremely popular among Pay Per Click managers. This shouldn’t surprise anyone given the impact sitelink extensions have on increasing click through rate significantly in comparison to ads that don’t utilize this extension type.

Google AdWords Sitelinks


The following data gathered from 3 DragonSearch PPC clients ranging in industry display this significant impact on click through rate. Please note metrics marked as “SE” correspond to ads that displayed sitelink extensions while “No SE” corresponds to ads that didn’t display sitelinks. Also, it is important to keep in mind that these data sets were collected from 3 very diverse industries and thus have very different sitelink extensions ranging from promotions to whitepapers to contact forms.

Sitelinks Click Through Rate

As you can see from the right-most column displaying the difference in click through rates between ads utilizing sitelink extensions versus those that don’t, the impact of sitelink display is significant. This is nothing new as plenty of studies and fellow PPC’ers out there have given the same insight. The purpose of this post is to not answer how but rather why?

Why do sitelinks have such a tremendous impact on click through rate? Are the sitelinks that appealing or is it something else?

By segmenting each data set above by click type in the AdWords interface, the results are somewhat startling for ads displaying sitelink extensions as displayed below.

Sitelinks versus Headline

Looking at the above data sets, only about 6% to 7% of users who saw an ad displaying sitelink extensions actually clicked on one of those additional links with the overwhelming majority clicking on the headline of the ad.

Why Do Sitelinks Dramatically Increase Click Through Rate?

Since the same headline can display within ads that are displaying sitelinks and those that aren’t, the headline itself is likely not a factor in the overwhelming difference between headline and sitelink clicks displayed in the previous table. So why then do sitelinks have such a significant impact on click through rate if the sitelinks themselves are not the primary driver of clicks?

Ad Size

Ads utilizing sitelink extensions, especially those where 2 columns of links are used rather than a single line, take up more real estate than other ads. As a result, users are drawn to these ads simply because of their size. Of course relevancy between the ad and the user’s search query is still very important.

Trust and the Look of Being Official

Talking to several individuals on why they would select an ad utilizing sitelinks over one that doesn’t, nearly all of them mentioned a certain feeling of trust in the advertiser because of being presented with more options in the ad. In these cases, it was not the specific sitelinks that portray a feeling of trust and official authority but just their general presence. With the ever growing volume of spam and fraudulent activity online, trust can go a long way in attracting potential consumers.

Extra Effort Goes a Long Way

Although the implementation of sitelink extensions doesn’t take that long from a PPC manager’s perspective, the end-user is not aware of the simplicity behind this implementation. Therefore, ads using sitelinks tend to portray the advertiser going the extra mile in making his/her ad much more relevant and friendly to the consumer in comparison to other advertisers that seem to have just thrown an ad up and hope it works.

Your Thoughts?

Why do you think sitelinks have such a significant impact on click through rate? Have you found data that is similar or completely different from what I’ve detailed?

I’m very interested in hearing your thoughts on why sitelink extensions truly have an impact on click through rate.

Share and Enjoy

    Tags: ,

    Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
    Sort: Newest | Oldest

    Hi Andy, Really like your article. I saw it was written a while back, but since I am currently struggling with sitelinks myself, i would still like to ask you how you have been tracking the difference between Ads showing sitelinks and ads not showing sitelinks. Since sitelinks run at campaign level it seems impossible to run an experiment between ads with and without sitelinks. COmparing different timeframes also seems to be inaccurate. Could you indicate how you got to your figures exactly? thank you so much in advance!

    Hi Martin, First off thanks for reading and the kind words. You are correct in that it is nearly impossible to determine the true impact sitelinks have on overall performance since they cannot be integrated into campaign experiments. As a result, we are basically most interested in impacts on CTR, traffic, and navigational behavior from the extensions. My figures are based off of 2 separate pieces of data: sitelink extension statistics in the Ad Extensions tab and the overall stats for a particular campaign. So for the real estate example in my post, I knew how many impressions occurred from ads with sitelinks via the Ad Extensions tab. To calculate impressions, clicks, & CTR for ads that did not use sitelinks, I simply subtracted the totals that were found in the Ad Extensions tab from the campaign totals i.e. Ad Extensions tab had 4,190 impressions while campaign total was 42,850. Therefore, there were 38,660 impressions for ads that did not have sitelinks. Same process with Clicks and then clicks/impressions for CTR. Hope this helps. Best, Andy

    Have you analysed the data for the SAME keywords? The CTR varies hugely depending on the keyword (on my site its over 20% if someone searches for our product by name, but it drops to under 2% for some generic keywords). The CTR for the site extensions is about 5%. Sitelinks tends to show up for keywords that already have a very high CTR, and its meaningless to compare a site average with the SE subset of the site average, for a product. When I looked at the graphs for total clicks, from before and after turning on sitelinks, there was no significant difference, indicating they are not increasing overall traffic by anything measurable. You also need to factor in whether sitelinks are poaching from organic results, if you are lucky enough to be ranked highly for something.

    Hey Andy, nice article. Did you use GA to track the results, or did you use the data from AdWords? Thanks, Chad

    Hi Chad, Thanks for reading. The data displayed in this post is specifically from AdWords; however we do have site links setup to track in Google Analytics too. I still wish Google would provide some sort of segmentation tracking in Google Analytics rather than having to append site link URLs with Google Analytics tracking though. Best, Andy

    Hi Luke, What is your primary method of conversion tracking currently? Is it AdWords conversions, Google Analytics or something else? I have personally not found a way to track AdWords conversions from sitelink extensions yet since you cannot select those columns within the AdWords interface. If you are currently tracking conversions/goals in Google Analytics than you will need to append the destination URLs of sitelinks with the appropriate Google Analytics tracking parameters. You can build the appended URLs via the Google Analytics URL Builder here http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=55578. Let me know if this helps & thanks for reading. Best, Andy

    Have you seen any way to track conversions from site links? We're seeing awesome CTR's also but those mean nothing if they're not converting.

    Hi Andy,

    Really like your article. I saw it was written a while back, but since I am currently struggling with sitelinks myself, i would still like to ask you how you have been tracking the difference between Ads showing sitelinks and ads not showing sitelinks. Since sitelinks run at campaign level it seems impossible to run an experiment between ads with and without sitelinks. COmparing different timeframes also seems to be inaccurate. Could you indicate how you got to your figures exactly? thank you so much in advance!

    Hi Martin,

    First off thanks for reading and the kind words.

    You are correct in that it is nearly impossible to determine the true impact sitelinks have on overall performance since they cannot be integrated into campaign experiments. As a result, we are basically most interested in impacts on CTR, traffic, and navigational behavior from the extensions.

    My figures are based off of 2 separate pieces of data: sitelink extension statistics in the Ad Extensions tab and the overall stats for a particular campaign. So for the real estate example in my post, I knew how many impressions occurred from ads with sitelinks via the Ad Extensions tab. To calculate impressions, clicks, & CTR for ads that did not use sitelinks, I simply subtracted the totals that were found in the Ad Extensions tab from the campaign totals i.e. Ad Extensions tab had 4,190 impressions while campaign total was 42,850. Therefore, there were 38,660 impressions for ads that did not have sitelinks. Same process with Clicks and then clicks/impressions for CTR.

    Hope this helps.

    Best,

    Andy

    Have you analysed the data for the SAME keywords?

    The CTR varies hugely depending on the keyword (on my site its over 20% if someone searches for our product by name, but it drops to under 2% for some generic keywords). The CTR for the site extensions is about 5%.

    Sitelinks tends to show up for keywords that already have a very high CTR, and its meaningless to compare a site average with the SE subset of the site average, for a product.

    When I looked at the graphs for total clicks, from before and after turning on sitelinks, there was no significant difference, indicating they are not increasing overall traffic by anything measurable.

    You also need to factor in whether sitelinks are poaching from organic results, if you are lucky enough to be ranked highly for something.

    Hey Andy, nice article. Did you use GA to track the results, or did you use the data from AdWords?

    Thanks,

    Chad

    Hi Chad,

    Thanks for reading.

    The data displayed in this post is specifically from AdWords; however we do have site links setup to track in Google Analytics too.

    I still wish Google would provide some sort of segmentation tracking in Google Analytics rather than having to append site link URLs with Google Analytics tracking though.

    Best,

    Andy

    Hi Luke,

    What is your primary method of conversion tracking currently? Is it AdWords conversions, Google Analytics or something else?

    I have personally not found a way to track AdWords conversions from sitelink extensions yet since you cannot select those columns within the AdWords interface. If you are currently tracking conversions/goals in Google Analytics than you will need to append the destination URLs of sitelinks with the appropriate Google Analytics tracking parameters. You can build the appended URLs via the Google Analytics URL Builder here http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=55578.

    Let me know if this helps & thanks for reading.

    Best,

    Andy

    Have you seen any way to track conversions from site links? We're seeing awesome CTR's also but those mean nothing if they're not converting.