Archive for August, 2008

Google Testing New Checkout Badges

August 26th, 2008 by admin

by Steve LaLonde – PPC Manager at DragonSearch

As many of you may already be aware, Google Checkout is Google’s own checkout process. AdWords advertisers who offer Google Checkout to their customers have been eligible to use Google Checkout badges in their AdWords ads for quite some time now.

While searching this morning, conducting a bit of research on organic pet products, I came across this eye-catching Google Checkout Promotional Sale Badge, which touts a $5 off deal at Petco.com. This is a badge I’ve never seen before in the Google SERPs. Here it is:

New Google Checkout Badge

Immediately curious about these new badges, I did some searching to look for any info on the new checkout badges. I couldn’t find a single thing on these badges, so I decided to contact the team at Google Checkout.

Their quick response confirmed that Google is, indeed, testing new promotional Checkout badges (available to select advertisers participating in a current Google Checkout back-to-school promotion).

As part of this experiment, a percentage of search results on google.com will display the promotional badge. We’ve done experiments with our badges in the past and we’re committed to constant refinement and experimentation in the future. We have no further details to share at this time.

I’d love to see some click through and conversion data on these new sale badges! They’re certainly attention-grabbers to say the least. Is a Google Checkout promotional program in the works for all AdWords advertisers who offer Google Checkout? We’ll have to wait and see!

AdWords Changes on the Way: Quality Score Going Real Time. Is this a Good Thing?

August 25th, 2008 by admin

by Steve LaLonde – PPC Manager at DragonSearch

The folks at Google have announced some new changes on the horizon for AdWords. These changes could be quite significant, to say the least. First, lets look at the three proposed changes, and then play a bit of Devils Advocate, in regards to #1 and 2:

1). AdWords will now calculate Quality Score in ‘real time’, at the time of the search query.

2). AdWords will no longer display ‘minimum bid’ requirements, and will instead display ’1st page bids’.

3). Google will no longer mark keywords as ‘inactive for search’.

Let’s look at #1 first. AdWords Quality Score has always been a static attribute given to the keywords within your campaign. A ‘poor’ Quality keyword was a poor quality keyword, until you deleted it or made some changes to improve. This ‘static’ Quality Score, although frustrating at times, allowed advertisers to take note of relevance issues, and make changes to improve overall performance.
Now that Quality Score will be dynamic, and determined in real time, this is a major change which could make it more difficult to identify issues and act on them.

Our biggest question is “how will Google report Quality Score to advertisers, now that it is a dynamic ‘real time’ attribute?” Since QS will now be variable, and potentially always-changing, AdWords won’t be able to simply report a static QS at the keyword level, as it does now. This Quality Score info is important, as us advertisers need to see Quality Score, and take actions to improve. We certainly want more transparency – not less – when it comes to our campaigns and the variables that affect their performance. We’re curious to see if and how Google will tell us what our Quality Scores are for keywords, now that they could be many different things (Poor, OK, Good, Great), all in the very same day (or minute technically)!

#2 – Google will do away with minimum bid requirements, and now show us ’1st page bids’. This sounds great, as most people want to know how much it will cost them to show on the first page of search results.

On the other hand, this is a bit worrysome for a few reasons. In the past, high minimum bids (like when Google forces you to pay at least $0.50, $1.00, or $5.00 just to keep a keyword active) immediately made you aware of a problem with your keywords. High minimum bids almost always indicated a very poor Quality Score.

Now that AdWords will get rid of ‘minimum bids’, and give us ’1st page bids’, we may not know why exactly a particular keyword costs ‘$5.00′ to display on the first page. Advertisers may assume the keyword is simply very competitive and expensive. The root cause though, could be a poor Quality Score. You don’t want to be fooled into paying high CPC’s because you assume that the suggested CPC is simply the ‘going rate’, do you?

Side note: I also speculate that bids as a whole may increase as a result of the new ’1st page bids’, as most advertisers will want to bid for the required first page position, using Googles suggested bid. This “1st page bid” suggestion will certainly be higher than current ‘minimum bids’, which are usually only $0.05 or less for keywords with great Quality Scores.

#3 – Google will no longer mark keywords as ‘inactive for search’. This simply means that keywords will never technically be inactive, but still may not display for a number of reasons (low search volume, bids too low, poor QS). I’m not really sure what impact this will have on advertisers quite yet.

All in all, the upcoming AdWords changes are interesting to say the least. Hopefully Google will not only make these changes, but provide us with new, stronger insights into Quality Scores, and why exactly we have to pay $X.XX to display ads on the first page. We need more transparency, not less, so we can continually take actions to improve.

The proposed changes should begin appearing in select AdWords accounts over the next two months. I’m going to take exact snapshots of one of our existing client campaigns, so we can do a bit of comparison, old vs. new.

Will Google’s suggested 1st page bids be higher (or lower!) than what I’m currently paying for 1st page display? Will we see more Quality Score insights – or less – than we currently do? Here at DragonSearch, we can’t wait to do a comparison and full evaluation of the new changes. Stay tuned!

Insights for Search – Another Excellent Free Keyword Tool From Google

August 8th, 2008 by admin

by Steve LaLonde – PPC Manager at DragonSearch

Just a few days ago Google debuted a new tool called Insights for Search. After spending a few moments checking it out, it’s clear that this tool is another winner and fills several voids in the SEO/M toolbox.

So what can one do with Insights for Search? Well, quite a bit:

  • look at search trends for keywords, and compare against other words
  • find related keywords
  • find hottest rising keywords
  • look at category based top keywords and category based hottest rising searches
  • category based keyword search volume trends, and the relative growth of a keyword compared to its category
  • look at keyword data by location drill-downs (great for local search SEO / PPC)
  • view world heat maps which show regional interest (again great for the local folks)

Insights for search is certainly useful in many new ways. Let’s look at one quick example here.

Say you’re advertising Manhattan (NYC) apartments via AdWords on a national level. Insights for search shows us trending search volumes for the phrase over a given time period. Pretty cool data here, and even more interesting if your researching very seasonal markets.

Now here’s something really cool. We see regional interest and a heatmap. Looks like we may want to add Kansas as a negative keyword if we’re advertising our Manhattan (nyc) apartments on a national level.

Moving along with our ‘Manhattan Apartments’ example, we see top searchers and rising/breakout searches related to the term. As you can see below, “kansas”, “ks” and “beach” would probably be good negatives to add to our campaign, right off the bat just to be safe. We also see that the #3 Breakout rising search is a misspelling, “apartments in manhatten”. This could be an excellent misspelling to test in our PPC campaign.

Besides the above examples, I can think of several other uses for this tool too (finding keyword ideas for local SEO clients, figuring out why chosen keywords aren’t performing as well as they used to (trending downward lately?), finding new negative keywords, finding high volume, low competition ‘breakouts’…and many more).

All in all, it looks like Insights for Search could be an absolute goldmine for conducting both SEO and PPC keyword research. It brings several new elements to the keyword research arena, which other tools had certainly been lacking.

Looks like Google’s done it again. I’d imagine other paid keyword research tools had better step up and deliver new killer products, or watch their subscription base quietly diminish.



DragonSearch - Ready to Get Started? Have Questions? Kingston, NY 845-383-0890 and NYC 212-929-2780

©2010 DragonSearch

URL for RDF/RSS 1.0 feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/rdf/ URL for RSS 0.92 feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/rss/ URL for RSS 2.0 feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/ URL for Atom feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/atom/