Archive for July, 2009

SEO Strategies: Where be the Boondoggle?

July 30th, 2009 by admin

Boondoggle- work of little or no value done merely to look busy (definition by Wordnet)

The term “boondoggle” acquires painful precision in the articles by Jill Whalen and Eric Ward, which have elicited a large number attacks from those who do not quite agree (to put it mildly) with their stances on SEO strategies.

The Boondoggle

bridge_to_nowhereIt is difficult for professionals to be told by fellow professionals that the sweat from their brow is caused by boondoggle, hence the acrimony Ms. Whalen’s and Mr. Ward’s words continue to draw.  Whistleblowing is never an easy task for the whistleblower(s), and the harsh but very possibly valid criticism of certain long treasured SEO strategies and techniques is not something that can merely be ‘attacked’ away by SEOs who are afraid of reconsidering their designs.  However one may react to the abovementioned readings, it all comes down to data and its analysis; and one can be almost certain that both Jill Whalen and Eric Ward have enough of it to backup their criticisms. (more…)

Yahoo and Microsoft Agreement: The Impact on PPC

July 30th, 2009 by Andy Groller

That’s right folks, 2 out of the big 3 used for paid search advertising are teaming up in an attempt to take down the 800 lb gorilla that is Google. Or so it seems.

The announcement was made yesterday that a Yahoo and Microsoft agreement has been reached that impacts only search results and search advertisers. Although they anticipate the closing of the agreement to occur in early 2010, the details of the agreement can be found on the newly established site http://www.choicevalueinnovation.com/thedeal/Default.aspx, which was created by both companies to inform the public of the agreement.

So what does this mean for paid search advertisers?

This is where it is still a little hazy.  According to the press conference held yesterday by both companies, the agreement is only affecting paid search advertising, not display advertising. Basically, Microsoft’s newly launched search engine Bing, which my co-PPC specialist Siobhan Peterson analyzed in a previous post, will be powering Yahoo’s search results on the back-end. Search result pages will still be mainly Yahoo branded, as discussed in the conference, but each page will state it is powered by Bing.

In regards to PPC advertising, the agreement gets a little tricky. The Microsoft adCenter platform and auction process will serve both search engines for paid search advertising only. From what is discussed in the press release and conference, Microsoft and Yahoo will still compete against each other in contextual advertising.

This makes life for pay per click advertisers more complicated because supposedly there will be only one platform used for PPC advertising when the agreement is finalized: adCenter.

According to Carol Bartz, the CEO of Yahoo:

“This, by having one system, adCenter, as opposed to both Panama and adCenter, we really expect — and Microsoft’s commitment to an ease of use platform, we really expect that we can provide a much better experience for this tail of advertisers and, in fact, win them over to this bigger marketplace.”

Okay Carol, but what about knowing where a paid ad displays? I hope if only 1 platform is used, there will be some form of report that shows when an ad displayed on a Yahoo search results page and when it displayed on a Bing search results page.  Also, since Bing is now powering Yahoo search, will Yahoo have the same ad predictor setting that Bing has?

Let’s face it; people will still go to Yahoo thinking it is still better than a search conducted on MSN/Bing and also because of its branding, even though they are using the same technology. Does anyone really think searchers will care about the little “Powered by Bing” on the bottom of the page? Users will still type www.yahoo.com into their browser URLs. This creates a need to know where our ads are displaying, whether it is on Yahoo or Bing.

What makes this whole agreement even better (sarcasm intended) is that the Yahoo and Microsoft contextual networks PPC advertisers use are not joining forces.

So does this mean there will be separate platforms used for display ads but not paid search ads?

Picture if you will this scenario, which I hope is not the case. You want to advertise both paid search and display ads through Yahoo and Microsoft. To run your paid search ads on both search engines, you simply need to login to one adCenter account and set up your campaigns. Simple, right? Now you go to set up contextual network advertising campaigns and guess what? You now have to login to separate Yahoo and adCenter accounts because display ads are not part of the agreement.

If this scenario ends up becoming a reality, I wonder how large the decrease in display ads used on Yahoo’s content network will be. Think about it, a PPC advertiser typically sets up a paid search campaign first and then moves on to a content network campaign. If we’re no longer setting up paid search campaigns in a Yahoo interface, are we really going to be inclined to login to a Yahoo account just to set up a content network campaign? Some food for thought there, but again this is only speculation based on how I interpreted the press release and conference. It would be great to hear your thoughts on this agreement and it’s impact.

Only time will tell what this agreement means in terms of necessary accounts, settings of accounts, and a whole host of other interrelated issues.  It is our job as PPC advertisers to do what we do best: optimize.

YouTube PPC – Now Your Videos Can Have Direct Links to Your Site!

July 24th, 2009 by Andy Groller

Nearly every pay per click advertiser knows YouTube is owned by Google and thus within the “search partners” category of the typical AdWords account. In addition, YouTube offers a pay-per-click program specifically designed to promote your videos which is ironically called Promoted Videos. YouTube PPC is very similar to how a Google AdWords ad group is set up, with the advertiser centering the promotion around a central idea or theme, creating an ad, selecting paid keywords to trigger that ad, and so forth.

What’s great with YouTube pay per click is that the data, such as impressions, clicks, and click through rate, is displayed in the AdWords interface.

So when you’re optimizing your AdWords campaigns and keywords, your YouTube PPC data is right at your fingertips. The only problem I have found with this so far is that although the YouTube pay per click data is displayed, edits cannot be made without going into your YouTube account.

As said, YouTube PPC works the same way as AdWords/Sponsored Links. When a user visits YouTube and searches for something, for example “energy vitamins”, a section on the right side of the page displays Promoted Videos that are utilizing this phrase as a paid keyword. An example is displayed below:
Promoted Videos

If the user clicks on one of these Promoted Videos, they are then taken to the specific video’s page.

This is where YouTube has really made this program worthwhile.

(more…)

Social Media Measurement – Why Is It Controversial?

July 10th, 2009 by admin

Measuring Social Media is a bone of contention for many

Perhaps the difference of opinions in how to measure Social Media boils down to our background.  All business majors are taught the importance of quantifying your marketing efforts through measurements such as ROI  in order to economically justify the effectiveness of these efforts.  Then along comes Social Media Marketing and suddenly business and marketing professionals are forced to delve deep within the reserves of our brain to access all that we absorbed while sitting through economics, finance, marketing and statistics classes and apply this knowledge to quantify social interactions.  That’s a tall order if you ask me.  “A tall order” – hold that thought…

tall-order

Doesn’t part of the whole “college experience” involve acquiring skills other than those defined as purely academic?  What about the all-important Social Skills?  Just because you get a 1600 on your SAT (2400 now), does this mean that you will become an instant success upon leaving college and entering the real world?  Or course not.  But the SAT doesn’t measure social skills.

In Measuring Social Media, Ask Yourself How Do You Define Success?

(more…)

Social Media Return on Investment – Some more thoughts

July 9th, 2009 by Ric Dragon

Return on Investment (ROI) is not really complex.  It can be if you want to work out how money appreciates or depreciates over time, or if you wish to re-invest earnings as they come in – but you don’t have to approach it with all of that. For the sake of this discussion I’m going to take the simple approach. (more…)

My Favorite Top 10 Social Media Wonks on Twitter

July 9th, 2009 by Ric Dragon

Here’s my list of Social Media wonks to follow on Twitter.  Caution, some of these individuals are frequent posters – and keeping up with their tweets can be daunting.  But the gems that pop up here and there are well worth the effort.

  1. Guy Kawasaki (GuyKawasaki) – as of today, over 147K followers, with nearly 27K updates
  2. Tara Hunt (missrogue) – author of Whuffie
  3. Matt Cutts (mattcutts) – the horse’s (Google’s) mouth
  4. Chris Brogan (chrisbrogan) – author of Trust Agents
  5. Clay Shirky (cshirky) – author of Here Comes Everybody
  6. Beth Kanter  (kanter) – big focus on non-profits
  7. Chris Anderson (chr1sa) – Wired editor, author of The Long Tail and Free
  8. Peter Shankman (skydiver) – author of Can We Still Do That
  9. Josh Bernoff  (jbernoff ) – author of Groundswell
  10. Charlene Li (charleneli) – author of Groundswell

Figuring Social Media as a component in Customer-based Corporate Valuation

July 9th, 2009 by Ric Dragon

Hans H. Bauer and Maik Hammerschmidt  wrote an interesting  paper, Customer-based Corporate Valuation, which discusses Customer Lifetime Value as a component in valuing corporations.  One particular part of the article jumped out at me – a section on the Reference Value of a customer (as a sub-category of Revenue). (more…)

Top Five Things I Hate About Facebook

July 7th, 2009 by Andy Groller

Infuriating Facebook Quizzes And Poor Facebook Etiquette

Sometimes, late at night, I sit in front of my computer and wonder, “If I could shoot Facebook in the…well, face – what type of gun would I use?” It’s not that I hate Facebook enough to wish digital harm on it. It’s just that between the relentless Facebook surveys and the lack of any real Facebook etiquette, I want to throw the World Wide Web into a Full Nelson and scream into its depths – “You people are the reason that the Internets cry.” read more on why I Hate Facebook



Ready to Get Started? Have Questions?

NYC 212-929-7716     Kingston, NY 845-383-0890

©2010 DragonSearch

URL for RDF/RSS 1.0 feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/rdf/ URL for RSS 0.92 feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/rss/ URL for RSS 2.0 feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/ URL for Atom feed http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/feed/atom/