Google Plus: A (Skeptical) Perspective of the “Facebook Killer”

I am a self-professed social media nerd: I’ve tried every emerging social network from Diaspora* to The Necter. I still even login to my MySpace and Bebo accounts from time to time. So when Google Plus (or Google+) was introduced, there was no question that I would be harassing someone on Twitter for an invite.

Luckily, I didn’t have to harass anyone. My fellow #usguys pal Jeff Reidy (@jeffin140) was kind enough to share his invites before Google+ exceeded its bandwidth.  Nonetheless, I logged into Google Plus with skepticism rather than excitement. Well aware of the intentions of this “Facebook Killer,” I put on my loyalty pants (did I mention I still logon to MySpace?) and began social networking away.

What Separates Google Plus from Facebook and Twitter

One word: originality. Facebook and Twitter were both revolutionary social networks because they went where no social network had gone before.  As opposed to MySpace’s stronger appeal to anonymity, Facebook focused its interactions based on real-life relationships. Twitter created a public environment to connect users with both similarities and difference by putting a twist on the old chat room format. Twitter became successful by making the world a little bit smaller each day and building real-time relationships.

So how does Google Plus stack up against its predecessors? Well, if the Winklevoss twins could sue over the concepts behind Facebook; I’m sure that Twitter, Facebook and Tumblr would all have a case against Google Plus.

Let’s examine a few features:

  • Plus One (+1) Button: This is the Facebook “like” all over again
  • Circles: while the interface is much easier to use, this is definitely a cop of Twitter lists and Facebook friend categories
  • Share: Again, this has been done already by Tumblr (reblog), Facebook (share) and Twitter (retweet)
  • Profile Layout: Again, not that impressive. Both the status updates and visual flow are similar to older Facebook layouts
  • Hangout: Similar to Skype for Facebook. Interface is a bit easier to use; however, the main aspects are very similar.
  • Suggestions: Again, both Facebook and Twitter have friend/follow suggestions. Only instead of running off of pre-existing social relationships and algorithms, it suggests email contacts. Mind you, most of the people I email are NOT friends. Rather, they are spam or corporate newsletters.
  • +/@ Mentions: At first, I thought “+” was the answer to the Facebook/Twitter “@”. Upon further investigation, both symbols work on Google Plus.

Perhaps Google Plus will come up with more…well…innovative features in the future. Not only that, they forgot to add in a “Poke” component!

Google Plus Security and Access: Who Sees What and Why

One of the first things to jump out at me about Google Plus was that anyone can add you to a circle. OK, I get that…it’s like have Twitter followers—only in reverse. When you follow someone on Twitter, you see their feed in your stream. In Google Plus, if you add someone to your circle you begin pushing your feed to their stream. The conundrum? MAYBE I don’t want to see your spam in my stream without choosing to.

Granted, Google Plus does allow you to mute someone’s posts after the fact. In my opinion, it gets tedious when spammers jump on the bandwagon and start mass following. Eventually, I’ll be sitting there manually muting users one-by-one. I prefer the mutual approved sharing of a Facebook friend, or the opt-in feature of a Twitter follow, over the circles feature.

Additionally, Google Plus’ limited access and shut down of invites due to bandwidth concerns have left some early adopters turned off by the emerging social network. While I had no problem getting an invite, many of my coworkers and colleagues missed the cruise ship to Google+ Island. Perhaps Google should have prepared for a high demand accordingly. How do you expect to win over the masses if you lack the capacity to do so?

Every emerging social network has security concerns and loopholes as well. A recent blog post explored the first Google Plus’ privacy flaws, citing that by re-sharing a user’s post to any of your circles, you are opening that user’s profile up to your entire circle despite what their privacy settings are. Again, this is the first security flaw to be pointed out; however, I have a sneaking that it won’t be the last one.

The Google Plus Matrix: Big Brother Is Watching

I’m going to preface this section with this hilarious (yet a tad bit frightening) cartoon from Current.com.

I’m not a conspiracy theorist or a victim of paranoia. Nonetheless, I am an online marketer that understands the inner workings of how most social networks and search engines are monetized—and the plethora of information they have access to. That being said, I enjoy that Facebook is untouchable by Google. My Google search is not influenced by my offhanded comments and information shared with Facebook. I like to refer to this as my online separation of church and state.

For this reason, I don’t want to use Google Plus as my primary social network for fear that my online presence will be monopolized through one corporation.  Google already has access to my tweets, my emails, my searches—do I really want to sell my soul to Google Plus? The thought alone makes me want to signoff of all social networks.

Oh, and did you know that Google collects your billing information and can share it with their employees?

Using Google Plus for Businesses and Marketers

From what I can see, there is no way to create a corporate account for businesses on Google. What that means is that businesses and social media marketers lack a way to communicate (without paying) to Google Plus users. At first, one might see this as a great way to keep the marketing aspect out of social networks and be true to the description.

Think again. Google Plus could possibly use this platform as a way to force more businesses of all sizes to invest in Google AdWords. Whereas Facebook has a separation of Fan Pages and Ads, there seems to be no free use of the service for businesses. Basically, Google will have massive amounts of information about consumer sentiments at their fingertips and—rather than allowing users choose what brands they want to like—will force businesses to rely solely on their paid and organic search results in Google.

Why Google Plus Hasn’t Won Over My Facebook Loyalty…Yet

There is a reason why Facebook has over 700 million users: it has been around for 7 years, it was revolutionary at it’s launch, and Facebook is constantly evolving. That being said, I am skeptical that Google can successfully launch a new social network in such a short period of time without any standout qualities. Seven years online is like dog years for social networks, perhaps making it too little too late for Google Plus.

Additionally, it is highly unlikely that Facebook, the largest social network in the U.S., will allow for future user integration with Google Plus. Being a member of Facebook since 2005, I personally have no urge to turn my back on six years of my life recorded online to switch over to using solely Google Plus. I’m sure a sizable chunk of those 700+ million users have similar sentiments. As I mentioned before, I still login to MySpace as there is pre-Facebook information on there that I like to reference (and am too lazy to backup).

Final Thoughts on Google Plus

At this point, Google Plus has to build its support network from the ground-up. While Google will be occupied trying to win over users, Mark Zuckerberg probably won’t be sleeping for weeks as never-ending Facebook hackathons ensue. Remember when Tony Stark built Iron Man to fight off the bad guys, and then the bad guys were even more motivated to make a bigger, badder Iron Man? Just saying.

What are your thoughts on Google Plus? It is really a Facebook Killer, or will it sink just like the Titanic (and Google Buzz)?

Share and Enjoy

    Tags: ,

    Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
    Sort: Newest | Oldest

    Hi, you know I did read this blog earlier! I flipped through it at the time thinking "you're right." FB has the early start and Google+ could be just another fizzle in the arsinal of admirable attempts by Big G. But will the continuing online conversation, and a sense of awkwarness with some of the SM functionality, I started wondering if Google may have streamlined things. I know you and your UsDragons colleagues are really facile with all this -- but I do have a hankering for simplicity in the SM world. Maybe that would happen if Apple uses its $76 Billion in cash to buy into FB [http://theweek.com/article/index/217556/apples-76-billion-problem-by-the-numbers] ?

    John, I can't argue that G+ has been very successful so far. I think that it will not be the Facebook killer because individuals have their preferences--they are too similar to bother using both in excess at the same time. I don't think Zuckerberg will ever sell. This is a great read on him: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/09/mark_zuckerberg_hes_just_like.html There's too much emotional attachment. If he does sell, it will only to invest the earnings in something bigger and better. If that is the case, Google might want to gird their loins. I'm probably the only UsDragon who is not a huge fan of the G+. It's an uphill battle I fight ever day, but I think that Google has way too much power and knowledge about what I do already. Having access to my emotions and sentiments is a bit overkill.

    The only thing I see google plus has going for it is that it is new. In the same way Facebook was created with from the roots of college societies and secret clubs [according to Social Network movie if you believe that], google launching plus as a 10 million only cap at first is trying to hype up the release. It's like they are trying to be like that cool new swanky bar that just opened that is impossible to get into because it is exclusive. I think they are gonna build the tension for a while and then open the floodgates. Also, it is easier to manage sorting friends. I think F-book needs to perhaps re-work the process of sorting through the hundreds to thousands of friends we have so it can be quicker to manage them. And above all the first social network that comes right out and is super transparent about where my data, info, and sharing is going will be a winner in my heart! Why do I have to find obscur internet articles to see what my "private" life is contributing to. This is not the 80's where we are all technology idiots. We are smart people and deserve to know exactly what it is we are investing ourselves into.

    I believe the end is near for facebook. To me it seems like facebook is turning itself into the next myspace by providing to many options. games, movies, pages, and whatever else. people dont like so many choices. it's trying to do everything in an old outdated ugly interface that the people who started using facebook in the beginning are looking for anything decent to move on to. and then i believe everyone will follow because thats just how it works. i think google plus could be that next step. cell phones and tablets are driving the future. why do you think facebook is making a phone? Because they are about to be left behind and only used by old folks using a desktop computer. i dunno just throwing out some biased views as facebook has just deleted my account lol.

    I understand where you're coming from with the MySpace reference, however, I still don't see the death of Facebook. MySpace and Facebook were only launched 1 year apart, whereas Facebook has the clear advantage with 7 years in the game. And again, Google didn't launch anything extremely revolutionary...mainly just pulled features of other social networks and tweaked it to the their liking. There's also reports that social gaming is coming soon, so if you think Google+ won't have it's share of, well, Farmville invites--thing again.

    700+ million facebook users represents an almost unstoppable momentum. Of those hundred of millions of users, relatively few are tech savvy, or care or notice that it is somewhat outdated. Or even care very much about privacy settings. Part of its success is the simple interface, and perhaps generally low expectations - other than connecting with friends past/present. Even an email program like gmail, that groups emails of the same thread together - is too complex, or too much of a learning curve, for many people.

    @ Eric I guess I don't really care about connecting with people that I kinda new but dont really talk too like most people. In my opinion you and your real friends dont use facebook that much to connect to each other. its used mainly by older people who are crazy and destroy facebook by liking every status someone they barely know posts. posts status' no one cares about. posts pictures and memories that if not backed up on ur computer or on actual pictures will be gone forever once facebook eventually dies. Say Creepy things to girls and just act like they are facebook gods when in fact they are old idiots that are trying to use something that isnt the thing to use anymore. similar to how facebook started out for only people in college. google+ is starting out for only people with gmail accounts. it will win over the generation that made facebook successful and if all the older and younger people wanna keep in touch with us, theyll have to move on over lol.

    @Jeff Facebook does let you download your complete history, including pictures and posts, and has let you do so for awhile. As far as connecting with people you don't know, I'd say its easier to deny a friend request than prevent who adds you to a circle. I've personally already witnesses complete strangers adding people to circles by the masses, including myself, and it's a real turnoff.

    yeah you are prolly right, i just get little hunches about things that are about to change. maybe not from google+ but i hope something soon revolutionary comes and changes the way social networking works. only time will tell.

    You can still get Free Google Plus Invites at http://www.free-google-plus.com It’s the only site I know that you can still get invites at right now, since Google stopped allowing the public.

    I agree with your analysis. I'm not sure, but I think you need a google account profile for google plus, (although you can use a non-gmail account login), which I think is a show stopper. facebook, and most other services, do not require creation of a new email account. Although facebook is outdated and quirky, I dont think they are the next RIM/Blackberry - they know what needs to be done. I think there is room for more than one social network - whether google+ is here to stay or not. If it fails to catch on, I think it might be useful as a business social-intranet, as part of google apps, where you definitely don't want personal and business to mix.

    I don't think Google+ is going to fail completely, but it definitely is not a Facebook killer. Like the plethora of other social networks, the people who do not want to be on Facebook won't be and Google+ is a new option for them.

    You made google+ sounds much less cool that I thought it would be. But I still really want an invite.

    It's better to join the bandwagon and jump off when the road gets bumpy than get left behind. I'm still not in love with it, though.

    Will it be a major league or minor league team? Can it get all the players it needs to compete? (Will Google + have better hot dogs than FB? - and will they charge extra for the mustard?) - that's what I want to know - some time will tell...but initially, it sounds like a cover version of a hit song.

    Deidre... I am in the same corner as you are, at least for right now. Here is what I see... most doing google + are those super social media geeks or those that get it, which in my opinion, is not your average consumer. And because of my main business, the average consumer are the ones that I want to connect with the most... for them to find me on the net. I get social influence and everything that is ever changing... and how I could be found through other friends... but again, for basic and long tail search terms, that will be my best value. Overall.. my opinion regarding google + and Empire... if you are a realtor, a landscaper, lawyer, jelwery designer, etc, etc... and you want business from the average consumer, would you want to spend a lot of focus on these 2 new sites? Or spend it with a lot of social media geeks that get it, but will be with just each other... Curious... #justsayin Good post... I guess time will tell. Jeff

    I read a post that Google has plans (no launch date) for business pages. Curious as to if it will integrate Google Places with Google Plus. I like your perspective on reaching the general audience. A few of my non-marketing (yet fairly social savvy) friends have Google+ on their radar, but mainly the ones going gaga over it are my industry peers. Also, I am not a big fan of Empire Avenue. Too much like Farmville for it to hold legit industry credibility. Personally, I don't feel that social is anything that you should have to dump cash into for personal, non-corporate applications.

    Hi, you know I did read this blog earlier! I flipped through it at the time thinking "you're right." FB has the early start and Google+ could be just another fizzle in the arsinal of admirable attempts by Big G. But will the continuing online conversation, and a sense of awkwarness with some of the SM functionality, I started wondering if Google may have streamlined things.
    I know you and your UsDragons colleagues are really facile with all this -- but I do have a hankering for simplicity in the SM world. Maybe that would happen if Apple uses its $76 Billion in cash to buy into FB [http://theweek.com/article/index/217556/apples-76-billion-problem-by-the-numbers] ?

    John, I can't argue that G+ has been very successful so far. I think that it will not be the Facebook killer because individuals have their preferences--they are too similar to bother using both in excess at the same time.

    I don't think Zuckerberg will ever sell. This is a great read on him: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/09/mark_zuckerberg_hes_just_like.html

    There's too much emotional attachment. If he does sell, it will only to invest the earnings in something bigger and better. If that is the case, Google might want to gird their loins.

    I'm probably the only UsDragon who is not a huge fan of the G+. It's an uphill battle I fight ever day, but I think that Google has way too much power and knowledge about what I do already. Having access to my emotions and sentiments is a bit overkill.

    The only thing I see google plus has going for it is that it is new. In the same way Facebook was created with from the roots of college societies and secret clubs [according to Social Network movie if you believe that], google launching plus as a 10 million only cap at first is trying to hype up the release. It's like they are trying to be like that cool new swanky bar that just opened that is impossible to get into because it is exclusive. I think they are gonna build the tension for a while and then open the floodgates.

    Also, it is easier to manage sorting friends.

    I think F-book needs to perhaps re-work the process of sorting through the hundreds to thousands of friends we have so it can be quicker to manage them.

    And above all the first social network that comes right out and is super transparent about where my data, info, and sharing is going will be a winner in my heart! Why do I have to find obscur internet articles to see what my "private" life is contributing to. This is not the 80's where we are all technology idiots. We are smart people and deserve to know exactly what it is we are investing ourselves into.

    I believe the end is near for facebook. To me it seems like facebook is turning itself into the next myspace by providing to many options. games, movies, pages, and whatever else. people dont like so many choices. it's trying to do everything in an old outdated ugly interface that the people who started using facebook in the beginning are looking for anything decent to move on to. and then i believe everyone will follow because thats just how it works. i think google plus could be that next step. cell phones and tablets are driving the future. why do you think facebook is making a phone? Because they are about to be left behind and only used by old folks using a desktop computer. i dunno just throwing out some biased views as facebook has just deleted my account lol.

    I understand where you're coming from with the MySpace reference, however, I still don't see the death of Facebook. MySpace and Facebook were only launched 1 year apart, whereas Facebook has the clear advantage with 7 years in the game. And again, Google didn't launch anything extremely revolutionary...mainly just pulled features of other social networks and tweaked it to the their liking. There's also reports that social gaming is coming soon, so if you think Google+ won't have it's share of, well, Farmville invites--thing again.

    700+ million facebook users represents an almost unstoppable momentum. Of those hundred of millions of users, relatively few are tech savvy, or care or notice that it is somewhat outdated. Or even care very much about privacy settings. Part of its success is the simple interface, and perhaps generally low expectations - other than connecting with friends past/present. Even an email program like gmail, that groups emails of the same thread together - is too complex, or too much of a learning curve, for many people.

    @ Eric I guess I don't really care about connecting with people that I kinda new but dont really talk too like most people. In my opinion you and your real friends dont use facebook that much to connect to each other. its used mainly by older people who are crazy and destroy facebook by liking every status someone they barely know posts. posts status' no one cares about. posts pictures and memories that if not backed up on ur computer or on actual pictures will be gone forever once facebook eventually dies. Say Creepy things to girls and just act like they are facebook gods when in fact they are old idiots that are trying to use something that isnt the thing to use anymore. similar to how facebook started out for only people in college. google+ is starting out for only people with gmail accounts. it will win over the generation that made facebook successful and if all the older and younger people wanna keep in touch with us, theyll have to move on over lol.

    @Jeff Facebook does let you download your complete history, including pictures and posts, and has let you do so for awhile. As far as connecting with people you don't know, I'd say its easier to deny a friend request than prevent who adds you to a circle. I've personally already witnesses complete strangers adding people to circles by the masses, including myself, and it's a real turnoff.

    yeah you are prolly right, i just get little hunches about things that are about to change. maybe not from google+ but i hope something soon revolutionary comes and changes the way social networking works. only time will tell.

    You can still get Free Google Plus Invites at http://www.free-google-plus.com It’s the only site I know that you can still get invites at right now, since Google stopped allowing the public.

    I agree with your analysis. I'm not sure, but I think you need a google account profile for google plus, (although you can use a non-gmail account login), which I think is a show stopper. facebook, and most other services, do not require creation of a new email account.
    Although facebook is outdated and quirky, I dont think they are the next RIM/Blackberry - they know what needs to be done. I think there is room for more than one social network - whether google+ is here to stay or not. If it fails to catch on, I think it might be useful as a business social-intranet, as part of google apps, where you definitely don't want personal and business to mix.

    I don't think Google+ is going to fail completely, but it definitely is not a Facebook killer. Like the plethora of other social networks, the people who do not want to be on Facebook won't be and Google+ is a new option for them.

    You made google+ sounds much less cool that I thought it would be. But I still really want an invite.

    It's better to join the bandwagon and jump off when the road gets bumpy than get left behind. I'm still not in love with it, though.

    Will it be a major league or minor league team? Can it get all the players it needs to compete? (Will Google + have better hot dogs than FB? - and will they charge extra for the mustard?) - that's what I want to know - some time will tell...but initially, it sounds like a cover version of a hit song.

    Deidre... I am in the same corner as you are, at least for right now. Here is what I see... most doing google + are those super social media geeks or those that get it, which in my opinion, is not your average consumer. And because of my main business, the average consumer are the ones that I want to connect with the most... for them to find me on the net.

    I get social influence and everything that is ever changing... and how I could be found through other friends... but again, for basic and long tail search terms, that will be my best value.

    Overall.. my opinion regarding google + and Empire... if you are a realtor, a landscaper, lawyer, jelwery designer, etc, etc... and you want business from the average consumer, would you want to spend a lot of focus on these 2 new sites? Or spend it with a lot of social media geeks that get it, but will be with just each other... Curious... #justsayin

    Good post... I guess time will tell. Jeff

    I read a post that Google has plans (no launch date) for business pages. Curious as to if it will integrate Google Places with Google Plus. I like your perspective on reaching the general audience. A few of my non-marketing (yet fairly social savvy) friends have Google+ on their radar, but mainly the ones going gaga over it are my industry peers.

    Also, I am not a big fan of Empire Avenue. Too much like Farmville for it to hold legit industry credibility. Personally, I don't feel that social is anything that you should have to dump cash into for personal, non-corporate applications.