Racist Ads, Beyoncé and Modern Marketing

January 20th, 2012 by
Deidre Drewes

It’s 2012. The President of the United States is of Kenyan descent.  Theoretically, race should no longer be a hot-ticket conversation in the U.S. and other westernized countries, right? Wrong.  Even in marketing, racism (though toned down) is still prevalent. Back in 2008, L’Oreal created an outrage with an advertisement that portrayed a much lighter-skinned Beyoncé. In the advertisement, not only does Beyoncé have blonde hair, her skin tone is clearly photoshopped to appear much lighter than her natural complexion.

Racist Beyonce ad for L'Oreal portrays the musician with lightened skin

In December of 2011, Dutch magazine, Jackie was in hot water after using derogatory names in the title of a fashion piece on pop singer Rihanna. While the context of racism in marketing has changed, its existence surely hasn’t. Modern advertisement may use subliminal racial innuendos now, as opposed to blatant slavery or skin tone references of yesteryear.

Racist advertisement for root beer

Do you have an example of racism portrayed in modern marketing?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

Tags: , , ,

Send to a Friend:





Send to a friend:

Related Posts:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
saraj 5 pts

Yes just about every add you see. It's all about being white. L'Oreals products are NOT for black people, not even mixed people. Their hair products are for people who are white or of caucasian decent. So having Beyonce on there anyways is just confusing as on any given day, why would she reach for a L'Oreal product made for white people with white peoples biology in mind?

When i open a magazine, I would be shocked to see more than one or two people of some ethnic origin sprinkled in there. If there are any, they are usually in adverts, and are most commonly asian, as that is media/marketing's second best thing to white people will still giving them the ability to say "LOOK,WE ARE DIVERSE,!"

It's not even racism anymore. It's the fact that if they use black people or any one not white, readers , viewers or whatever, would think "IS this product targeted at these "minorities" for a reason? It must be a "special" product or "special" promotion. Like If you saw an advert featuring 5 people of Indian decent. You would assume what?

I dunno, just some ramblings I think about this often. I live in Norway, I am a minority, I am mixed. You will rarely if at all see any minority in a Norwegian magazine, publication or advertisement, even though Norway is actually quite culturally diverse and theres no better reason than , if they used a minority in their ad, no one would take a look, because they would again, assume it was something for these certain types of people because whether we like it or not, we are different biologically from hair to skin and in this specific example with Beyonce, why WOULDNT they lighten her skin? Their products are not made for people of African decent. They are chemically formulated for white people. I know we all want a fair and balanced world where it wouldnt make any difference whos in an advertisement, but it does and always will.

Deidre Drewes 5 pts

saraj I completely agree--advertising and merchandising still focus highly on differences among race, gender, etc. However, I don't think that this will ever go away. Models will always be typecast for ads and runway shows. Watch any modeling industry reality show and you will hear them talk about "The Girl Next Door" or the "Catalog Model."